|
FACT
SHEET
Truck
Driver Fatigue
Each
year truck crashes kill over 5,000 people and injure almost 150,000
more on our nation's roads and highways. Nearly one in four passenger
vehicle deaths in multiple-vehicle collisions involve a large
truck. In 1998, 98% of the fatalities in two-vehicle crashes involving
passenger vehicles and large trucks were occupants of the passenger
vehicles. Large trucks are involved in multiple-vehicle fatal
crashes at twice the rate of passenger vehicles. Furthermore,
almost 800 large truck occupants, almost all of them drivers,
die each year in these crashes. In recent years, almost one of
every four fatalities among passenger vehicle occupants have been
the result of multi-vehicle collisions involving a large truck.
When commercial drivers become fatigued from excessive daily and
weekly work hours, they substantially increase the risk of crashes
that result in death or serious injuries. According to the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), more than 750 people
die and 20,000 more are injured each year due directly to fatigued
commercial vehicle drivers. For this reason, the FMCSA has issued
a proposed rule change to hours of service regulations governing
commercial vehicle operators. The current rule requires that commercial
drivers operate a truck or bus no more than 10 consecutive hours
before resting for minimum of 8 hours. This permits fatigued drivers
to spend 16 hours driving in any 24 hours period. The new rule
proposes a rotating schedule of work/rest based on a 24 hour period
instead of an 18 hour period which requires longer rest periods
for the drivers.
FEATURES
OF THE PROPOSED RULE THAT PROMOTE SAFETY
The proposed rule is based on a 24-hour (circadian) clock requiring
drivers to rest between 9-12 continuous hours each day. Any interruption
in the off-duty time by dispatchers, shippers or other personnel
requires the driver to re-start the off-duty period.
Under the proposed rule, drivers must take up to 2-3 hours of
breaks in addition to the required 9-12 hour off-duty period.
The proposed rule limits commercial vehicle drivers to a 60-hour
work week, with some exceptions. Upon reaching the maximum work
hours per week, drivers must have an off-duty period encompassing
at least 2 successive nights.
The proposal requires long-haul and regional drivers to use tamper-proof
devices such as Electric On-Board Recorders (EOBR) which monitor
actual daily and weekly driving time.
FEATURES
OF THE PROPOSED RULE THAT CONTRIBUTE TO FATIGUE
The proposal allows commercial vehicle drivers to operate their
rigs for 12 consecutive hours which is 2 hours longer than permitted
under current law. This would greatly increase truck driver exposure
to the risk of crashes at the point of greatest fatigue.
The proposed rule allows for only a minimum of 32 hours off-duty
rest after 5-6 days of driving for 12 consecutive hours. In addition,
it allows unlimited nighttime driving without restriction.
The schedules offered in the proposed rule actually allow a 6.3
day on-duty/off-duty rotation which could result in some drivers
operating their rigs 300 hours per month and 3600 hours per year.
This is over 50% more than the average amount of hours accrued
yearly by worker in other economic sectors.
The proposal does not distinguish between driving and non-driving
truck work. For example, some drivers would be able to drive the
twelve hours maximum and then spend several more hours loading
and unloading freight during their daily mandated off-duty rest
time, leading to their falsification of record of duty log books.
The proposal also allows long-haul drivers to operate their trucks
for 6 consecutive days followed by only a short layover before
another 4 consecutive days of driving, followed by a long (80
hours) layover before beginning a new tour of duty. This formula
is reverses the appropriate rest periods for off -duty drivers.
Drivers need more time off after longer driving stints, not less.
DRIVER
FATIGUE FACTS
Large trucks accounted for 13% of all passenger vehicle
deaths in 1999 yet represented only 3% of all registered vehicles.
(National Highway Transportation Safety Administration or NHTSA,
2000).
Truck driver fatigue is a contributing factor in as many
as 30-40% of all heavy truck crashes. (NHTSA, 1994).
A 1995 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) study found
that of 107 heavy truck crashes, fatigue was a prominent factor
in 75% of the run-off-the-road crashes, with 68% of long-haul
drivers and 49% of short haul drivers suffering fatigue-related
crashes.
Working long shifts not only radically increases the risk of performance
errors due to lost alertness and drowsiness, but it also impairs
a trucker's ability to gain proper restorative sleep even when
they have sufficient off-duty time for sleep. (Federal Highway
Administration or FHWA, 1997).
Australian research and on-site investigations over the last several
years have determined that, overall, one crash in every five among
truck drivers is due to falling asleep at the wheel and that up
to 30% of truck crash fatalities on rural roads are due to sleep
deprivation.
The risk of a crash effectively doubles from the eighth
to the tenth hour of driving, and doubles again from the tenth
to the eleventh hour of driving alone. (FMCSA, 2000).
WHY
THERE IS A NEED FOR ELECTRONIC ON-BOARD RECORDERS
A study in the Netherlands showed that the use of EOBRs limits
violations and improves driver's attitudes, driving behavior and
compliance with safety regulations.
(Wouters and J. Bos, 2000).
In a 1997 FHWA survey, 28% of surveyed drivers admitted falling
asleep at the wheel during the previous month and one-third of
those same drivers admitted falling asleep at the wheel as many
as three to six times during the previous month.
An Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) survey in 1992
showed that almost 75% of the 1249 truck drivers polled violated
hours of service regulations.
A University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI)
survey of tractor-trailer drivers revealed that truck drivers
frequently drive longer than the 10 hour maximum permitted under
current law. (UMTRI, 2000).
PUBLIC
OPINION POLLS SHOW THAT AMERICANS HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT
TRUCK SAFETY AND TRUCK DRIVER FATIGUE.
According to a 2000 Insurance Research Council (IRC) study,
68% of Americans surveyed would pay more for goods and shipping
to have truckers work no more than 12 hours in one day.
The public does not believe that a new 24 hour cycle would
reduce driver fatigue and increase truck safety. (IRC, 2000).
Almost 70% of Americans surveyed strongly feel that data recorders
on large trucks should be required. (IRC, 2000).
A 1998 Lou Harris Poll indicated that 81% believe that sleep-deprived,
sleepy truckers pose a serious safety problem.
A 1997 Parade Magazine poll showed a groundswell of American opposition
to any increase in truck driver hours - more than 86% said "No"
to more truck driving time.
|